← All Essays
Profile 11 min read

Richard Garriott and the Ethics of Game Worlds

How Lord British went from selling games in plastic bags to building a moral philosophy into an RPG — and what it cost him

Lord British

Richard Garriott was born in Cambridge, England, to an American astronaut father — Owen Garriott flew on Skylab and the Space Shuttle — and grew up as an American who had spent enough time in England to acquire an accent his American classmates found exotic. They called him "Lord British" as a teasing nickname. He kept it.

Garriott wrote his first game, Akalabeth, on an Apple II in 1979 while working at a ComputerLand store in Houston. He sold 28k-copied it and sold copies in hand-labelled Ziploc bags from the store, charging $5. A California Pacific Computer Company representative bought a copy, was impressed, and offered to distribute it commercially. Akalabeth sold approximately 30,000 copies. The 17-year-old Garriott received royalties and used them to fund the next game, which became Ultima I.

The criticism and the response

Ultima I, II, and III followed through 1981–1983, each technically more sophisticated than the last. By Ultima III, Garriott had a commercial operation — Origin Systems, founded with his brother Robert — and a loyal player base. He had also started receiving letters from parents and religious groups criticising the games for teaching children to steal, to kill, and to optimise immoral behaviour for game rewards.

Garriott took this criticism seriously. He had designed games where the most efficient path to success involved looting, murdering, and exploiting every available game system regardless of in-game moral consequences. The criticism was, he concluded, substantially correct. He decided to make a game where the goal was not the defeat of an external villain but the achievement of virtue — and where every choice in the game was weighted against a moral framework.

Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar (1985) had no final boss. The goal was to become an exemplar of eight virtues — Honesty, Compassion, Valour, Justice, Sacrifice, Honour, Spirituality, Humility — by making consistently virtuous choices across dozens of hours of gameplay. Stealing from merchants, fleeing from battles, lying to NPCs, treating beggars with contempt — all of these registered against the player's virtue scores and made the true ending inaccessible. The game was not punishing; it was measuring. The world would show you who you were.

The Avatar and what it achieved

Ultima IV was a commercial and critical success, and it established a design vocabulary that Garriott continued through Ultima V, VI, and VII with increasing sophistication. The world of Britannia developed across those games into something genuinely coherent — a place with history, internal politics, recurring characters, and an evolving relationship with the Avatar (the player character) that changed based on the player's choices across multiple games.

No other game designer of the 1980s was doing anything comparable. The idea that a game world could have ethical consistency, that the player's choices could be evaluated against a moral framework the game articulated explicitly, that an RPG could be about the player's character rather than just the player character — these were Garriott's specific contributions. They influenced every morally-weighted RPG that followed, from Planescape: Torment to Mass Effect to The Witcher.

The later career

Origin Systems was acquired by Electronic Arts in 1992, which gave Garriott resources for more ambitious projects but eventually constrained the autonomy he'd had as an independent. Ultima Online (1997), the MMO he built with the Origin team, was the first major commercial massively multiplayer online RPG — another claim to a foundational innovation in game history.

Garriott left EA in 2000, spent $30 million of his own money to fly to the International Space Station in 2008 (fulfilling a lifelong ambition connected to his father's career), and has continued making games with varying degrees of commercial success through companies he controls. He remains one of the few game designers from the golden age who has maintained a public creative presence — opinionated, eccentric, and still thinking about the ethical dimensions of interactive worlds in ways that most contemporary designers don't.